 Best Sellers | | Home Canon ET67 Lens Hood for Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Lens | |
|  | |  | | | Canon ET67 Lens Hood for Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Lens | | | | | SKU:
CNET67 | | In Stock | | Availability:
Usually ships in 1 business days | | | | | |
One of the most important accessories for each lens you own. A lens hood provides multiple functions: it shades the lens from stray light, improving your contrast and image quality; in inclement weather, it can assist in keeping moisture or wind-blown debris off the lens; and it protects the front barrel from the inevitable impacts against walls, door frames, and other real-life obstacles. Almost all EF and TS-E lenses have a Canon lens hood engineered specifically for it.
| | | |
List Price:
| $55.00 | |
Our Price:
| $33.79
& this item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping.
| |
You Save:
| $21.21 (39%)
|
| | |
|
| | Product Details | | Product Length: | 3.9 inches | | Product Width: | 3.8 inches | | Product Height: | 3.4 inches | | Product Weight: | 0.5 pounds | | Package Length: | 3.9 inches | | Package Width: | 3.8 inches | | Package Height: | 3.4 inches | | Package Weight: | 0.05 pounds | | Average Customer Rating: |  based on 21 reviews |
| |
| | Features | 3.9 x 3.8 x 3.4 inches; 8 ounceshood is compatible with EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM.
| |
| | Customer Reviews | Average Customer Review: ( 21 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
23 of 26 found the following review helpful:
 An overpriced piece of plastic. Sep 28, 2006
By Chris A. Epler
Lets face it, it's a $35 piece of plastic. It fits the 100mm f/2.8 macro lens. If you want a hood for this lens, this is the one you need. But at $35, it's WAY overpriced.
8 of 8 found the following review helpful:
Useful, but expensive Dec 13, 2007
By Lenny
In addition to shading the lens from glare and preventing lens flare in your photos, a lens hood can also help protect the front element of your lens without degrading image quality (like a cheap UV filter, for example). When using on board or hot shoe flash, it may end up shading your subject from the flash.
After seeing the lens hood that came with my 24-105L, and comparing it to the one on my Tamron, I decided to go ahead, sacrifice a few lunches out, and get Canon hoods for my two other lenses. Sure, they're overpriced, but the 3rd party ones are overpriced as well even at half this price on eBay, and at least I know this one fits well.
I removed one star for the price. Otherwise it's perfect.
Pros:
Fits very well.
Inside is lined with a velvety material that will not reflect light.
Can be reverse mounted on 100mm macro for storage.
Cons:
Price.
Velvety material traps dust and dirt.
Needs to be removed to replace / remove lens cap (not really an issue with the hood - just need to get into the habit of removing cap before putting hood on).
32 of 41 found the following review helpful:
 Too expensive Jan 16, 2007
By Paulo Martel
This lens hood is a must if you are serious about macro photography with you 100mm f/2.8. I cannot praise the lens high enough, but that is no reason why Canon should rip us off, asking $40 for a piece of cheap plastic!! Why don't they follow Nikon's example and start shipping their lenses with hoods. After all, good and pricey lenses are for people who are serious about photography, and people who are serious about photography want to have hoods on their lenses!! So Canon, stop being greedy...
I give it a rating of 1/5 simply because the quality/price ratio is terrible.
3 of 3 found the following review helpful:
 Essential In Spite Of Price Jun 15, 2009
By Aku SantaFe
The Canon ET67 Lens Hood has actually surpassed my expectations for quality and utility, so much so that I don't mind the price as much as I originally did.
In my view, it is a better way to protect the lens from dirt and damage than a skylight filter. It will protect the lens thread better than a skylight filter in most cases, if the camera is dropped. It affords very effective protection from dirt, smudging, and scratching. It doesn't need to be cleaned, as a filter does. And the improvement in exposure quality that results from shielding a lens from stray ambient light and reflection is underestimated.
If you don't need to use more than one filter on your EF 100mm f2.8 Macro USM Lens and you take pictures outdoors, then the ET67 is an essential accessory.
20 of 28 found the following review helpful:
expensive but a fine product Jan 22, 2007
By billsirinek
Yes, the lens hood is pretty expensive for what it is, you have to take in account a few things:
1) You'll take better pictures with it than without it, especially in a bright lightbox or sunny day. I've bought hoods for all my lenses now.
2) Its about the same price as a good-quality UV filter you would use on your lens to protect it while not degrading image quality (ie: not the $10 tiffen filter Amazon is hawking on this page). I personally use both the hood and a B&W UV filter.
3) The lens is almost $500 as it is. $40 isnt the end of the world, especially when you consider what the next step up for Canon macros costs.
4) The lens hood makes the lens look pretty impressive, adding 3-4" to the length. Yes, that's just my opinion, but felt I would share it. ;-)
Anyway, Genuine Canon products are usually pretty pricy, but given the poor-quality third party knockoffs I've tried (shutter release cables, etc) its worth it to just spend the extra money.
See all 21 customer reviews on Amazon.com
| |
| |
| |  | |  |
|
Recently Viewed | You may also like ... |
